Vision of Ireland | 1951 Census: County Report

1951 Census of England and Wales, County Report (Sample Report Title: Census 1951: England and Wales: County Report: Yorkshire West Riding), Table 3 : " Acreage, Population, Private Households and Dwellings for AC, MB, UD, RD; Wards of CB, MB; CP, NT".

Show top level table	Barnard Castle	Show County Durham AdmC table

Click on the unit name for its home page If appears click for more detailed statistics	Acreage (Land and Inland Water) [1]	POPULATION					PRIVATE HOUSEHOLDS AND DWELLINGS, 1951
		1931	1951				Private Households [7]	Population in Private Households [8]	Structurally Separate Dwellings Occupied [9]	Rooms Occupied [10]	Density of Occupation
		Persons [2]	Persons [3]	Males [4]	Females [5]	Persons per Acre [6]	Private Households [7]	Population in Private Households [8]	Structurally Separate Dwellings Occupied [9]	Rooms Occupied [10]	Persons per Room [11]	Percentage of persons at more than 2 per Room [12]
Barnard Castle RD Total	110,118	19,197	18,718	9,954	8,764	-	5,250	-	5,224	21,143	-	-
Bolam CP/Tn	1,013	99	81	42	39	-	27	-	27	124	-	-
Cleatlam Tn/CP	1,124	98	108	48	60	-	27	-	27	124	-	-
Cockfield AP/CP	1,606	2,232	2,059	1,004	1,055	-	613	-	613	2,262	-	-
Eggleston CP/Ch	8,036	420	413	192	221	-	140	-	140	562	-	-
Etherley CP/Tn	4,107	5,868	1,835	897	938	-	557	-	552	2,012	-	-
Evenwood and Barony Tn/CP	6,173	-	3,090	1,531	1,559	-	973	-	969	3,635	-	-
Forest and Frith CP/Tn	17,698	471	384	203	181	-	111	-	111	442	-	-
Gainford CP/AP	2,345	1,002	942	490	452	-	257	-	247	1,241	-	-
Hamsterley Ch/CP	2,985	393	366	183	183	-	120	-	120	498	-	-
Headlam CP/Tn	808	84	75	33	42	-	23	-	22	121	-	-
Hilton Tn/CP	1,096	87	76	37	39	-	19	-	19	93	-	-
Ingleton CP/Tn	848	304	366	169	197	-	115	-	115	477	-	-
Langleydale and Shotton CP/Tn	4,660	175	139	70	69	-	35	-	35	176	-	-
Langton Tn/CP	1,085	111	94	61	33	-	19	-	19	95	-	-
Lynesack and Softley CP/Ch/Tn	3,742	2,125	1,826	915	911	-	569	-	567	2,098	-	-
Marwood CP	7,228	355	299	157	142	-	88	-	88	471	-	-
Middleton in Teesdale AP/CP	10,496	1,657	1,603	737	866	-	521	-	521	2,136	-	-
Morton Tinmouth CP/Tn	416	27	25	11	14	-	5	-	5	25	-	-
Newbiggin CP/Tn	4,638	304	244	131	113	-	79	-	79	317	-	-
Raby With Keverstone CP/Tn	2,814	243	224	110	114	-	59	-	58	324	-	-
South Bedburn CP/Tn	10,089	302	255	130	125	-	69	-	69	377	-	-
Staindrop AP/CP	2,006	1,212	1,209	605	604	-	370	-	368	1,555	-	-
Streatlam and Stainton CP/Tn	2,938	239	977	811	166	-	93	-	93	397	-	-
Wackerfield Tn/CP	751	140	82	42	40	-	26	-	26	108	-	-
Westwick Tn/CP	1,466	64	117	64	53	-	30	-	30	133	-	-
Whorlton CP/Ch	1,972	239	387	254	133	-	66	-	66	319	-	-
Winston CP/AP	3,046	459	1,091	854	237	-	131	-	130	623	-	-
Woodland Tn/CP	2,884	487	351	173	178	-	108	-	108	398	-	-
Undivided Moor Common To Lynesack and Softley Hamsterley and South Bedburn PA	2,048	0	0	0	0	-	0	-	0	0	-	-

Click on the triangles for all about a particular number.

Using data from this table, Vision of Britain can map the following rates for within Barnard Castle RD:

Rate	Date
Population Density (Persons per Acre)	1951

Notes:

The following notes to the table appeared in the original report.

1	For definitions of dwellings, households, rooms, etc., see pp. vii and xvi.
2	Acreage figures have been supplied by the Ordnance Survey Department; see p. vii.
3	All figures relate to the areas as constituted in 1951. 1931 figures are not available for those areas marked f (see p. vii).
4	Areas marked * have been created or altered during the 1931-1951 intercensal period; particulars are given either in the 1931 Census County Report, Part II, or in Table 5.

This website does not try to provide an exact replica of the original printed census tables, which often had thousands of rows and far more columns than will fit on our web pages. Instead, we let you drill down from national totals to the most detailed data available. The column headings are those that appeared in the original printed report. The numbers presented here, which are the same ones we use to create statistical maps and graphs, come from the census table and have usually been carefully checked.

The system can only hold statistics for units listed in our administrative gazetteer, so some rows from the original table may be missing. Sometimes big low-level units, like urban parishes, were divided between more than one higher-level units, like Registration sub-Districts. This is why some pages will give a higher figure for a lower-level unit: it covers the whole of the lower-level unit, not just the part within the current higher-level unit.